Translate

Sunday, March 12, 2006

Math Sucks! Especially My Instructor (TA) & (updated 3/12/06) Professors paid not to teach

Math Sucks! Especially My Instructor!


I have been doing a study on and off for the past few months. It involves the types of classes that college students (mostly seniors) drop after they initially enrolled. Some students told me they waited to long to drop and lost money, others stated they should have dropped because they failed.

There were two basic questions that I asked:
1) If you dropped a class during your stay at this college what was it?
2) What was the reason you dropped the class?

I also had a section for comments.

I gathered over 100 students from four different colleges – Michigan State University, Western Michigan, Eastern Michigan & Central Michigan, All are Division I Schools.

Getting the responses was easier than I thought, some I asked, and mostly I used Email addresses. All of these colleges had Email directories from which I chose names at random.

The results so far show Math type classes the overwhelming favorite (87%). I’m not sure I was surprised based on all the stories in all types of media (newspaper, TV, magazines).

There were a variety of reasons but if I had to categorize them I would label the category “Instructor.”

Some of the comments included:
Ø Could not understand (language barrier)
Ø Class size not conducive to learning
Ø Teaching Assistant (TA) does not know how to teach
Ø Professor does not teach uses a Grad Student (knows math but can’t teach)
Ø No standards between instructors (one does no reviews and leaves all learning up to you, while a different instructor teaching the same class goes all out for students.
Ø GPAs at risk because instructor says he can run his class any way he wants.
Ø If you can’t keep up drop the class, not my fault you can’t learn.

qualityg says … I have written on this subject before (we'll be watching you), especially inept math instructors.

The arrogance and absolute power shown in some of these statements about their instructors is sickening.


Students have little recourse. Administration does not respond in a timely fashion in order to help students in immediate need of help. Students have enough stress without having to fight with college administrators over their failure to get good instructors.

Am I wrong, I thought the student was the customer (honor roll for instructors)? The college pays for less than adequate instructors who produce less than adequate teachers who then get jobs in our high schools and teach less than adequate math skills. The college complains the high schools are sending students not prepared for college math. Seems to be a cyclical type system problem here with the student as the loser in all scenarios.

P/s – I will say it again, why are we paying for grad assistants and TAs to teach our children when it should be the professor. College administrators protect their own (instructors). They know students come and go and besides if the students fail or drop the class to late they will get more money when the student has to retake the course.

Sad, very sad, do something right and start having independent educators assess your instructors.

I can't wait to get the Emails from Math Instructors - Bring it on Puppy Dogs!


UPDATE 3/12/06


Professors paid not to teach
I have been complaining and writing about this problem for a long time. I was glad to open the front page of the Sunday Detroit News and read this excellent story by Paul Egan Professors don't teach of the Detroit News.

Sabbaticals cost ailing Mich. schools $23.2M; universities say they're needed to recruit top talent.
Following are some highlights and comments from the article:

Pros & Cons

  • Proponents say sabbaticals give faculty time to do research, travel and attract grants.
  • Critics say professor workloads are low and paying them to be absent is wrong when college costs for students are on the rise.

qualityg says ... first priority is educating students, all else is BS, send your TAs and Grad Students to do research. If they are smart enough to teach our children they are smart enough to do research and recruit. I'm sick of paying high tuition at a major university for second rate instructors. If a TA or Grad Student teaches a class the tuition should be lowered to compensate for their lack of experience and knowledge.

I enjoyed this statement from one of the worst offenders:

Gayle Davis, provost and vice president of academic affairs at Grand Valley State, said "professors at research universities such as U-M and Michigan State have lower teaching loads than nonresearch universities and also offer leaves of absence other than sabbaticals that professors can use to do research. Those are a couple of the reasons a school such as hers might top research universities in its rate of sabbaticals, Davis said."


Professors work hard, probably 60 hours a week on average at Grand Valley State, Davis said. However, "we have faced this kind of lack of understanding in the public since time began."

qualityg says ... Well, time began? Gosh, I'm sure that statement clears things up. By what method do you make that assumption Ms. Davis?

You lack the understanding that you and other universities and colleges promote a higher education for our students and then fill the clasroom with student teachers at our expense.

"since time began" - what a joke!

Friday, March 10, 2006

Fall 2005 MEAP Scores are in for the state of Michigan - Is your state like mine?

See 7/15/06 Post http://qualityg.blogspot.com/2006/07/quality-education-another-example-of.html

MEAP Scores for the state of Michigan are published at Fall 2005 MEAP Results.

I have been reviewing the data provided and it seems a little vague to me. For example let me share some comments made by some state educational resources regarding the scores.

  1. "We're seeing more money and resources on test preparation, does that make our kids smarter? No, it doesn't it makes them better able to take standardized tests."

qualityg says ... see similar responses from MEAP results for 2003 and 2004. Same response each year. I guess statements don't get much better either.

2. "The controversy would disappear if we could collectively agree on what kids should know after 12 years of schooling."

qualityg says ... I guess this means we don't know. Can't tell the players without a scorecard, how are we going to identify schools and children in need if we have no "stinking" standardized parameters.

3. "We need to have a system where teachers are supported to get their hands around the curriculum."

qualityg says ... I hope the teachers have some big meat hooks, it's going to take some monster paws to accomplish that task. You see Teachers are like Service Reps in a Call Center. The IT, Marketing, Sales and Operations folks all send their own requirements and information they want one rep to tell the customer, many times the rep has to go to multiple systems to get the answers or information. Teachers get bombarded by all sorts of educational committees and new political agendas.

4. "Other states are not only catching up with Michigan, they are moving faster than Michigan."

qualityg says ... Let me see Mr. DOE at a big school, it has been stated by many that Michigan's state test is one of the best and toughest in the nation. So that means in order for Michigan to be passed the rest of the nation must have the "same" test or "better." Oh pleeeeze stop making statements that are not factual. Unless you have a formula for factoring in the differences, then this statement makes no sense.

5. "State Test Scores Show Students Reaching Higher Curriculum Standards." - please read this statement found at the state educational site - State Scores Show ...

qualityg says ... a lot of percents are thrown around by different people in this statement.

If 100,000 students are evaluated and 20% percent don't fully meet or don't meet standards at all how many students would be affected?

100,000 X 20% = 20, 000 students (i.e., one grade only) - How does this figure relate to "No Child Left Behind (NCLB)?"

I have no other comment.

Monday, March 06, 2006

Autistic - SO WHAT - Basketball Player Jason McElwain Team wins State Title - WOW & Outdoor Play

Autistic basketball player creates mayhem at game

If you have not seen this news clip you are in for a real treat.


Quote:
"This is the first moment Jason has ever succeeded (and could be) proud of himself. I look at autism as the Berlin Wall, and he cracked it."
Jason McElwain's mother, Debbie McElwain


qualityg has a special place for autistic children. If you would like to learn more on autism please go to: http://nationalautismassociation.org/ or http://www.autismtoday.com/
qg is a member of both organizations.

J-Mac's meaningful message for autism

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=2352763

The following is a poem I wrote about some of my boys and how they play too.

Quality Education - State Scores way behind Federal Scores & Michigan to Roll Out Education Improvement Framework ???

The nation's students do glaringly worse on a tough federal test than they do on state exams in reading and math,
raising doubts about how much kids are learning


Under No Child Left Behind, all children must be proficient in reading and math by 2014. But there has never been a promise of consistency (read post ).

Such discrepancies are not uncommon. Students from all over the country performed worse on a tough federal test than they did on state exams in reading and math -- raising questions about whether states are setting lower standards.

http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/states/

States define what "proficient" means, and their expectations for students, tests and passing scores vary widely. States have a huge stake in the scores on their own exams, because they determine whether schools make enough progress to avoid federal penalties.


(click to get form) Michigan School Improvement PRE-Conference Wkshop - This one day conference (Thursday March 23) This workshop is specially designed for ISD schoolimprovement staff, education organizations and ABCS Coaches to preview several drafts of new School Improvement Framework tools, and discuss professional development options in preparation for the April 27th statewide rollout of the Framework. - Free
(click to get form) 2006 Michigan School Improvement Conference - This one day conference (Thursday April 27th) will provide you with practical, hands-on information and tools to understand and use the School Improvement Framework to support and enhance your school improvement efforts.- $125.00
qualityg says ... The first one is free and the second one costs $125.00. Is this Framework a Requiremt for all school districts? Is it mandatory? Why would you have to pay for something as important as this (because of a speaker)?

I have read the framework and posted it on this blog in May 2005 with questions that are still not answered (http://qualityg.blogspot.com/2005/08/education-qualityg-responds-81205.html).

Free Conference - Preview "several" drafts of Framework.


Cost Conference - Hands on information and tools to understand and use Framework.
Are you kidding me? The framework is based on Malcolm Baldrige criteria (don't let state tell you it's just a small part). To understand and use tools of this type usually requires one week of training, and then to be paired with someone who has had experience and application with this type of framework.
One more question - What is the cost for this rollout?

Sunday, March 05, 2006

Fake AT&T Leadership Is Nearing Deal to Acquire BellSouth for $65 Billion

Fake AT&T, BellSouth Near $65B Deal


qualityg has warned about these mergers for years. It still amazes me that the FCC and government do not just admit that judge Harold Greene (divestiture in 1984) was wrong about breaking up the "Real AT&T Bell System."


The corruption (MCI, WorldCom, QWEST, etc…), wasted dollars, political bickering between long lines and local, excessive corporate pay and golden parachutes, etc… I could go on and on but the real tragedy of this debacle was the 1 million employees that worked for the Bell System in the early 1980s.


Together, Fake AT&T (SBC) and BellSouth could have combined market capitalization of nearly $160 billion, dwarfing rival Verizon.

Together, the three companies employ more than 316,000 people, though that head count will fall as AT&T eliminates redundant operations.



qualityg said last December - click-->(SBC/ AT&T Merger) ...

Since 1984 the world and particularly the United States has suffered because of your moronic decision by Judge Harold Greene. Tell me where you can find a company today that has over a million employees with standardization and reliability that compared to AT&T in 1980. A million employees working and paying taxes with a good wage. No other company has ever come close to giving back to the communities in which they were located. In 1984 Michigan Bell employed close to 39,000 employees, today the number is around 13, 000.



Remember this headline) (BellSouth calls off AT&T deal) from a few years ago?
The Reason --> Among the details, say people familiar with the terms, was that Ackerman (BellSouth) was to remain CEO until his retirement, expected in 2006. Then Dorman would succeed him. The company would have been called AT&T. The company will still be called AT&T, but Double D (Dorman) is the odd man out with about $30 Million.

Again the Execs will win and the employees will lose. Don't believe me, ask ex-employees from PacBell, AT&T (the real AT&T), Ameritech, AT Home, NYNEX, etc...

This whole mess was not good for competition or the consumer. We would have a much more capable and reliable Security System and employment picture across the United States if Judge Greene would have listened to the people and not the politicians back in 1984.


Next Company to Go to Fake AT&T? Perhaps Lucent and then it's bye bye for Patricia Russo (CEO).

j-man sent me this article from Market Watch--> click on Link Breaking Up Is Hard To Do

for more updates go to http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=11874839&postID=115106688604964740