Gov. Jennifer Granholm on Thursday included reinstatement of the Promise as part of her budget recommendation for 2011. Funding for universities, community colleges and K-12 education would remain at their current levels under her plan.
More than 90,000 Michigan students were promised the scholarships after qualifying by passing standardized tests while in high school. However, to try to close a $2.8 billion budget gap, lawmakers didn't include the $140 million program in the state budget passed for the fiscal year that started Oct. 1.
College Officials are saying A plan to bring back the Michigan Promise Scholarship as a tax credit for graduates is better than nothing, but more needs to be done to help students pay their tuition.
The Promise Scholarship would be brought back as a $4,000 tax credit students could claim after graduating from a Michigan university and then working for one year in the state, according to Granholm's proposal.
qualityg says ... Why do they call it a "Promise" scholarship and it was broken. Call it something new like "Hostage Scholarship" -- after all if you have to stay a year in Michigan and you can't find a job then it can't be a tax credit if you earned no income --- HA
My son graduated from Michigan State and Illinois University (grad)and came home to find a job. He lived in my basement for 10 months until he took a job in Maryland.
Wake up Governor and College Officials -- Why don't you guarantee a job after graduation along with the tax credit? You can't do that because you have no belief in the system by which you operate but you expect the tax payers to foot your non-valued plans and promises (white woman speak with forked tongue).
Friday, February 12, 2010
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
"In order for each student to be successful there must be an understanding and balance between the partners."
Click on Pic to EnlargeI have been using my "Quality Educational Partnership Triangle" quite frequently for the past few weeks. It becomes handy when I talk to teachers and most importantly when I talk to parents about education and what is need to help their child succeed in school.
It is a very simple concept that relies on each corner (Administrators (includes Administrative support personnel, coaches, etc...), Parents, and Teachers) of the triangle to be working together. In the main three groups of the triangle are revolving around the student rather than teachers, parents or administrators.
I talk to parents and teachers about changing our methods from the one size fit assessments (i.e. tests) all mentality to one that uses whatever instrument it takes to know if the student is learning. For example, what is wrong if the student orally explains to you the subject or knowledge you are trying to transfer as opposed to writing or guessing it on a Test. Why can’t a journal be kept that takes the subject matter and is applied to one’s everyday life? If we talk and listen to the student we will know as educators if our concepts are being transferred.
Means of learning is most often an individual event for students and it should be our (all groups mentioned in triangle) responsibility to customize learning to fit each student’s mode of learning.
We may have moved into the Digital Age but our education and teaching methods are still based in an Industrial Age mode that teaches the mass-production ways of learning that one size fits all. Nothing could be further from the truth.
It bothers me very much that states (Michigan) are increasing the amount, requirements and level of Math when for years we all know that a majority of students are not grasping math concepts. So instead of trying new methods and concepts we trudge along with an instructor lecturing and writing on the blackboard and then using worksheets as the main means of digesting the subject matter. These type of decisions make no sense and are made by narrow short-term thinking individuals who have no concept or business making these type of self-serving decisions!
The state has set up our students to fail and they are failing. Not just in grades but in self-esteem and self-worth. Not just the students who are struggling but for the students who do excel in math because many of the schools are dumbing down math and science classes so students can still graduate.
We must start with a simple concept like the Educational Triangle and build our new system with all the groups and technology supporting and revolving around our students. When one side or group fails it is the student who takes the brunt.
Educational Partnership Triangle is Developed (2004) and Owned by gmc (qualityg).
For more write-ups on the educational process click here: http://dreammentorprogram.com/DMProcess.aspx